woodham tries for a humourous take on the drug/celeb/sport/thingy..and finishs with an attack of the ‘frank hadens’…when she plays to the bleachers by muttering that..”..those found guilty of dealing drugs deserve everything they get..”
now c’mon kerry..reality check, eh?..
correct me if i’m wrong, but i seem to remember same woodham burbling on somewhere about a misspent youth…(womens’ mags..was it.?)
of course a misspent youth could involve the odd occaison where the misspent youther could have been around illegal substances..may have taken some illegal substances..(and not being busted just a matter of luck and circumstances..refer to peter dunnes flirtations with herb in his wild youth..y’know..what he wants to stigmatise other new zealand youth with if they happen to be not so lucky/fortunate as him during their youthful experimentation stage..sanctimonious opportunistic po-faced hypocrite that he is..)
i digress..y’see kerry i see your above statement as another example of that gob-smacking hypocrisy i accuse dunne of….think/remember on..and thank your lucky stars you weren’t busted when you were with your companions at that time..when they may have breached/broken some of societies more stupid strictures…eh..?
and don’t forget..that anyone out there who at any time scored a bit of weed for a mate, or whatever..is legally a ‘drug dealer’…
“..deserving of everything they get..”.eh kerry?
i think you are guilty of double standards..(esp coming from work cultures in many cases sodden with intoxicants..from the legals to the not so..eh kerry..?…)
how does it go..?..that’s right..bah, humbug..
go to source/story>> The New Zealand Herald