(ed: along with others i called this as a possible false-flag operation from day one – as it did not make any sense for assad to mount this attack – given how well everything else was going for him – there was no visible/possible strategic-gain for him – only loss..
whereas for trump..?..only a major publicity gain/distraction from his domestic-woes..
if it looks like a false-flag – walks like a false-flag – and quacks like a false-flag – it probably is one..)
On April 7 President Trump committed his first ‘act of war’ attacking Syria with missiles in response to what he said was a poison gas attack by the Syrian government that killed dozens.
But the White House’s subsequent intelligence report offering its proof of Syria’s role was ‘false’ and ‘fraudulent’ suggesting a ‘cover-up’ of a president acting without any intelligence or intentionally lying to the public.