Hillary Clinton’s tragic 2016 campaign faced withering criticism in the press – social media and now in Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes’s inside account Shattered.
From my vantage point as lead pollster for the Democratic nominees in 1992 and 2000 – part of the closing clutch of pollsters in 2004 – and invited noodge in 2016 – I have little quarrel with the harshest of these criticisms.
Malpractice and arrogance contributed mightily to the election of Donald Trump and its profound threat to our democracy.
So did the handling of the email server – paid Wall Street speeches – and the ‘deplorables’ comment.
And her unwillingness to challenge the excesses of big money and corporate influence left her exposed to attacks first by Bernie Sanders and then by Donald Trump and unable to offer credible promise of change.
Yet the accounts of Hillary Clinton are very incomplete – miss the reasons for her ambivalence and miss most of the big structural forces at work that made it hard for her to commit to a different path.
That is where we learn the most about the progressive debate ahead.