While conservative students defend the importance of inviting controversial speakers to campus and giving offense – many self-identified liberals are engaged in increasingly disruptive – even violent – efforts to shut them down.
Free speech for some they argue serves only to silence and exclude others.
Denying hateful or historically ‘privileged’ voices a platform is thus necessary to make equality effective – so that the marginalized and vulnerable can finally speak up—and be heard.
The reason that appeals to the First Amendment cannot decide these campus controversies is because there is a more fundamental conflict between two very different concepts of free speech at stake.
The conflict between what the ancient Greeks called isegoria on the one hand and parrhesia on the other is as old as democracy itself.
Today both terms are often translated as ‘freedom of speech’ but their meanings were and are importantly distinct.
In ancient Athens isegoria described the equal right of citizens to participate in public debate in the democratic assembly – parrhesia the license to say what one pleased – how and when one pleased and to whom.